Why Do Dreams Need Guns?
I just finished watching Christopher Nolan's most recent film, Inception
. I found this movie perplexing on many levels, not the least of which was its relentlessly derivative post-Matrix
feel. This included all the fights and guns, which never cease to confound me in the context of reality-bending films: if reality can be bent at will (and we see entire cities literally bent in Inception
), then of what use are straight punches, combat rolls, and sharp shooters? This makes no sense, and only distracts from the ostensibly philosophical edge of the plot?or perhaps it's that the plot needs these violent charades precisely in order to mask the fact that there is no consistent philosophical project at work in the film.
The subject of dreams should make for fertile imagistic ground in a film; we've seen this in Richard Linklater's Waking Life
and Michel Gondry's Science of Sleep
. But what these films did well was to harness the minutiae and at times truly nonsensical residues of everyday life as a way to animate and (partially) translate or interpret the dreamworld. Inception
, on the other hand, tries far too hard to pull off an aesthetically complex but still basically linear narrative of multi-layered dreams. There are dreams within dreams within dreams?and finally, the film leaves the viewer wondering if the whole movie was itself a dream. (I actually think Cameron Crowe's Vanilla Sky
, a remake of the Spanish film Abre los ojos
, pulled off such an indeterminate ending more convincingly.)
The problem with Inception
is akin to the problem of Plato's allegory of the cave and the problem of The Matrix
, where there is no anchor point for something like actual reality. In each of these cases the supposed real 'reality' (beyond the Matrix, outside the cave, really being awake) always is open to being exposed as a further layer of simulation, sleep, or otherwise mediated deception. There is an infinite regress shot through all levels of the 'real'. Waking Life
played with this infinitely looping regress, but in a more truly playful way, accepting as it were the erosive quality of such speculation. Waking Life
followed Nietzsche's theory that "a dream, if repeated eternally, would be felt and judged entirely as reality"?and thus everyday life is just a long dream by another name. (And this is similar to Chuang Tzu's "butterfly dream" puzzle: upon waking from a dream in which one was a butterfly, one might not be certain whether one is actually a human who has just dreamt of being a butterfly, or a butterfly who is presently dreaming of being a human.) Even a film like David Fincher's Fight Club
did more justice than Inception
to the question of what is at stake when the line between the real and the fictitious gets blurred by the threshold of sleep. In that movie, the nameless narrator played by Edward Norton wakes up too late, just as the real world around him is starting to fall apart.
It is clear that Inception
is not a radical break from the lineage of recent dream/simulated reality films. But as the latest and most acclaimed of these films, it is worth asking: what might Inception
tell us about what all these characters are looking for with such consternation?
I wonder if this collective, outward looking gaze returns us to the topic of violence and guns in Inception
. Perhaps the nightmare that all these characters are looking to find their way out of is a dream of military dominance. For what else can all the scenes of paramilitary sniping, blasting, and machine-gunning possibly be about? Somewhat against Freud's formulation of dream-displacement (by which things of high psychic value are de-emphasized in the dream, and low value things get exaggerated and thus serve as psychical red herrings), I think that the guns & violence of Inception
(objects and actions that only become more
overdetermined as the characters go further 'down' into the subconscious) in fact function as fairly obvious dream symbols in this film.
The twist, however, comes at the level of whose dream we are referring to
. In my reading, the film is not about the various characters' dreams or nightmares at all. In fact the dream of Inception
is a cultural
dream work, a mass condensation of promises and investments concerning precision firepower and discrete time-frames for exiting certain theaters of war. In short, Inception
is about a very unfulfilled and dispersed desire for pinpoint military action and tidy resolution in Afghanistan?and by extension, all the other parts of the world for which Afghanistan stands as an untidy metonymy. The symmetry is all too obvious, in this case; it's whose dream this really is that is the question?not to mention how we might wake up from it.
Afghanistan ???????? Inception
- Plane Sighting, Found Essay
The other day I overheard a DJ on our local radio station talking about how President Obama was in New Orleans that morning. I was reminded of this a couple hours later when, while sitting in the backyard playing with Julien, Air Force One came rumbling...
- On Style: Sofia Coppola's "somewhere"
David Denby's review of the film "Somewhere" (in The New Yorker Dec. 20 & 27) astutely points out the director Sofia Coppola's penchant for hotel-bound characters. But while Denby castigates Coppola for being "fixated on a single subject," it...
- Up In The Air
Jason Reitman's film adaptation of Walter Kirn's novel UP IN THE AIR treats the subject of flight in two not entirely compatible ways, and these ways can be seen in this promotional still, with the singular George Clooney?s contemplative face...
- Down On Up
The problems with Pixar?s latest film Up are primarily formal ones. These include the onslaught of events, and a virtual saturation of characters. The events in Up are sequenced irregularly and create strange senses of importance: for instance, the breaking...
- Air Force One, Hijacked, Over Nyc?
(Photograph by Dan Kohn, from the NY Times) Yesterday people saw what looked like an utterly unique hijacking situation: Air Force One swooping low over New York City with military F-16 fighter jet escorts. Not only was 9/11 evoked, but its very singularity...